News
High court narrows scope of allowable police sting evidence

Jul 31 2014

OTTAWA – Confessions extracted through so-called Mr. Big police sting operations tend to produce unreliable confessions, are open to abuses and must be regulated more carefully in order to be admissible in court, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled Thursday.

The decision by the country’s highest court calls into question the convictions of Canadians behind bars across the country.

In a majority decision, the court ruled that stings like the one used to convict a Newfoundland man of drowning his three-year-old twin daughters can be risky.

The justices ruled that Nelson Hart’s confession during a sting operation more than a decade ago cannot be used against him should he face another trial. It will now be up to the Crown to determine whether Hart can be retried.

Hart was initially convicted of first-degree murder in 2002 in the drowning deaths of his daughter, Krista and Karen. At trial, court heard that Hart showed undercover officers, posing as members of the mafia, how he drowned the girls by shoving them into the waters of Gander Lake, Newfoundland.

But the conviction was overturned in 2007 by the province’s appeal court by a 2-1 margin. The ruling questioned the reliability of his confession.

The Supreme Court ruled that Hart’s Charter rights may have been violated and that Canada’s legal system does not adequately protect the rights of people who are subject to Mr. Big sting operations.

“I have concluded that the April 1 confession must also be excluded,” Justice Michael Moldaver wrote on behalf of the majority.

“As such, it is doubtful whether any admissible evidence remains upon which a jury, properly instructed and acting reasonably, could convict,” he added. “However, the final decision on how to proceed rests with the Crown.”

The Mr. Big investigative technique involves undercover police officers who recruit a suspect to a ficticious criminal organization while posing as gangsters. The aim is to obtain a confession to a crime.

But there are “significant problems” with such stings, the court said.

“To be sure, Mr. Big operations can become abusive, and they can produce confessions that are unreliable and prejudicial,” said the ruling.

The court said police and lawmakers must figure out a better way to extract solid confessions from suspects in criminal cases.

“We must seek a legal framework that protects accused persons, and the justice system as a whole, against these dangers,” it said.

“Mr. Big operations are a creative and sometimes useful law enforcement technique, but the courts must carefully police their boundaries lest they stray from being useful strategies into ploys that allow the state to manipulate and destroy the lives of individuals who are presumed to be innocent.”

EXECUTIVE DIGEST

TORONTO – An Ontario judge has agreed to hear a Charter of Rights challenge brought by telecommunication giants Telus and Rogers after police requested them to release cellphone information about 40,000 to 50,000 customers as part of an investigation in the Toronto area.
Page 3

A new supercomputer lab in the criminology department at Simon Fraser University will analyze crime data in ways never seen before in Canada.
Page 4

OTTAWA – A newly disclosed Finance Department memo warns that the high level of anonymity associated with Bitcoin transactions may make the virtual currency an attractive payment method for criminals.
Page 5

WINNIPEG – The retired judge who probed the death of Phoenix Sinclair says child death reviews ought to be made public.
Page 5

TORONTO – Chief Bill Blair will not stay on as head of the Toronto Police beyond next spring, according to a statement published by the board Wednesday.
Page 7