Rising policing costs and the future of public safety
June 9, 2022 By Lois Ann Dort, Local Journalism Initiative Reporter
June 8, 2022, Guysborough, N.S. – As the fiscal year drew to a close this spring and budgets were formulated by municipalities across the province, one of the biggest line items was policing costs – expenses which, for most municipalities in Nova Scotia, mean the price tag attached to RCMP service.
This year, both the Town of Mulgrave and the Municipality of the District of Guysborough (MODG) saw their policing costs rise by more than 11 per cent. The total budget line for the RCMP in Mulgrave is 10 per cent of its overall budget and has steadily risen year over year.
In a Town of Mulgrave council meeting last April, councillors voiced concerns over the cost of policing and the service the town was getting. This week, Mulgrave Mayor Ron Chisholm said that continued to be a concern but, “There has been a change in service. There has been a police presence in the town a little more regularly than it used to be. Next week, we have another meeting, a police advisory board coming up. We’ll just keep pushing it.”
Councillor Krista Luddington said, “I think it is really important to note that Mulgrave is not alone in this, it’s province wide. You look at our neighbouring municipalities and they seem to be feeling the crunch as well. The service that we’re getting, it’s a lot to put on a town of 627 people.”
Amanda McDougall, president of the Nova Scotia Federation of Municipalities, agrees with Luddington’s assessment. In an interview on May 25, she said, “What we’re hearing is fear, fear from municipalities; that concept of potential retroactive payments on top of these increasing policing costs, could, quite frankly, be crippling to different municipal units.”
The retroactive payment to which McDougall is referring is payment due to RCMP members under the recently ratified contract between the federal government and the union representing RCMP members. How and on whom this cost will fall has yet to be determined.
McDougall said, “If the municipalities are going to be charged some gigantic sum of retroactive payments throughout this year, that they have not budgeted for, what happens? How do they pay it? That has been very problematic from the get-go.”
The NSFM and the national body, the Federation of Canadian Municipalities, have been lobbying for the federal government “to step up and cover retroactive cost for members,” said McDougall.
Looking at policing overall, McDougall said she’s observed, over the years, conversations on provincial policing and shared services amongst regions.
“That’s where we, as NSFM, we can help facilitate conversations, we are an advocacy organization. If there are questions from our members coming up around potential policy at the provincial level, regionalization and modernization of policing for regions – we can facilitate conversations and definitely advocate on behalf of our membership. But, right now, a lot of the work has been ensuring that municipal units are not going to be burdened with huge sums of retroactive payments. The small municipal units, it’s an unfair burden to put on them without the proper consultation.”
MODG Warden Vernon Pitts said of the potential payment of the retroactive pay for RCMP members, “If it falls on us and it is a regulation, it’s legislated, we have to pay it. We don’t have any say in that.”
In the wider discussion about rising policing cost in regard to RCMP service, Pitts said, “You have some people saying it is costing too much for policing and we should have our own. That’s not feasible.”
Pitts said the MODG had investigated the cost of its own policing service several years ago but, after assessing salary, cost of equipment, office space, housing, not to mention the cost if a major investigation was required, it was clearly out of reach for a rural municipality like the MODG.
When asked if there was anything he would like to see the federal or provincial government do to help municipalities deal with policing cost, Pitts said, “I would like them to sharpen up their negotiation skills. We don’t mind paying for a service. Our council is of the opinion that we are getting a good service. We have no complaints with the RCMP in the manner in which they have been doing business here. Our crime rates are down, our stats are down. I think it is working well and it’s a good working relationship we have with them. The cost is another issue, that’s neither here nor there, we do have to have policing. And I think they’re the best organization to be doing the policing. It’s like one stop shopping – we’re getting what we paid for with the RCMP, we’re getting bang for our buck.”
The rising cost of policing, questions raised about the effectiveness of the RCMP in the Mass Casualty Commission, and the defund the police movement spurred by the murder of George Floyd and the Black Lives Matter movement have all converged to bring the future of policing into question.
– Guysborough Journal
Print this page